This web service allows to compute the Condorcet robustness denotation associated to the concordance relation as defined in the Rubis methodology. R. Bisdorff. Logical Foundation of Multicriteria Preference Aggregation. In Bouyssou D et al. (eds) Aiding Decisions with Multiple Criteria. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 379-403, 2002. R. Bisdorff, P. Meyer and T. Veneziano. Inverse analysis from a Condorcet robustness denotation of valued outranking relations. F. Rossi and A. Tsoukias (Eds.), Algorithmic Decision Theory. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, LNAI 5783, pp. 180--191, 2009. A list of criteria. Criteria can be activated or desactivated via the <active> tag (true or false). By default (no <active> tag), criteria are considered as active. Using thresholds is optional, only the constant ones with mcdaConcept equals to "indifference", "preference" or "veto" will be considered. [...] [...] [...] [...] ]]> A list of alternatives. Alternatives can be activated or desactivated via the <active> tag (true or false). By default (no <active> tag), alternatives are considered as active. [...] [...] [...] ]]> A performance table. The evaluations should be numeric values, i.e. <real>, <integer> or <rational>. The set of criteria weights.

The Condorcet robustness relation.

A list of messages generated by the algorithm.